Positioning Beats Polish: Why Your CV Isn't Working
Most people fix the font when the real problem is the argument. Here is how to shift from a well formatted document to a document that makes a case.

Most people who feel stuck in a job search do the same thing first. They rebuild the layout. New template, cleaner spacing, a tighter font, maybe a subtle colour. Two hours later the document looks better and performs exactly the same.
That is because the problem is almost never presentation. It is positioning.
What positioning actually means
A CV is not a record of employment. It is an argument. The argument is simple: for this specific type of role, in this specific type of organisation, I am a lower risk and higher return choice than the other people in the pile.
Every line either supports that argument or dilutes it. A three year old project that has nothing to do with where you are going does not sit there neutrally. It costs you attention, and attention is the scarcest thing in a hiring process.
The test that exposes weak positioning
Read only the top third of your first page. That is roughly what a recruiter sees before deciding whether to keep reading. Then answer one question out loud: what job is this person applying for?
If the honest answer is "something in operations, probably, or maybe project management", you have a positioning problem. The reader should be able to name the role, the level, and the type of company within about eight seconds.
Three symptoms of a CV without a point of view
The summary is a personality description. Phrases like driven, collaborative, results oriented and passionate about people are invisible. Everyone claims them, so nobody reads them. Replace the summary with a positioning line: what you do, for whom, and the scale you do it at. "Supply chain planner for high mix manufacturers, currently managing a 40 million euro portfolio across three sites" tells a reader more in one line than a paragraph of adjectives.
Every role gets equal space. Your last two roles carry the argument. Roles from more than ten years ago rarely do. If your first job takes up as many lines as your current one, the document has no hierarchy, which means the reader has to build one themselves. They will not.
The bullets describe the job, not you. "Responsible for monthly reporting" describes a job description that anyone in that seat would have. "Cut the monthly close from nine days to four by moving three manual reconciliations into the ERP" describes you.
How to rebuild the argument
Start from the destination, not from your history. Pick three real vacancies that represent the next step you want. Write down the four or five things all three ask for. That list is your brief.
Now go through your experience and find evidence for each item on the brief. Concrete evidence: a number, a scope, a decision you owned, a problem that existed before you and did not exist after you. Where you have strong evidence, give it space and put it high. Where you have none, be honest with yourself about whether that gap needs a bridge, such as a course, a side project, or an internal assignment you can volunteer for in the next quarter.
Then write the document in that order. The strongest evidence for the most important requirement goes near the top of the first page. Everything else supports.
What to do with the rest of your history
Nothing dramatic. Older roles get one line each: title, company, dates, and at most one achievement if it still says something useful about your range. You are not hiding anything. You are signalling what matters.
The uncomfortable part
Positioning means choosing. If you write a document that works for four different types of role, it will be weak for all four. A CV that is clearly aimed at one thing will get rejected more often and hired faster. Most people prefer the safety of a broad document and then wonder why it produces polite silence.
Choose the direction first. The polish takes twenty minutes once the argument is right.
If you want a second opinion on whether your document actually makes a case, run it through the free CV Quickscan. It reads the document the way a reviewer would and tells you what the argument currently looks like from the outside.